Labour MPs are warning the government that its proposed digital ID scheme will be an unnecessary cost and may alienate potential supporters. They argue the scheme will not effectively stop illegal migration and raises concerns about civil liberties and data security. MPs such as Nadia Whittome, Charlotte Nichols, and Liam Burgon have questioned the necessity of the IDs, suggesting the funds could be better allocated to pressing issues like the cost-of-living crisis.
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall stated that digital IDs would be mandatory only for employers conducting right-to-work checks, aiming to combat illegal working. She also suggested that individuals could voluntarily use the IDs to access public services more easily, citing examples from Estonia and Denmark where such systems have streamlined interactions. Ms. Kendall assured that individuals would not face sanctions, nor would the police demand to see the IDs. A consultation is planned before the end of the year, with the system to be built internally.
However, critics like Nadia Whittome expressed concern that the government is "burning through political capital" on a policy that constituents are not demanding. Liam Burgon highlighted the risks to civil liberties and data security, including the potential for data to be shared with US tech giants. Charlotte Nichols shared constituents' skepticism about the scheme's effectiveness in tackling illegal immigration. Stella Creasy pressed Ms. Kendall for cost figures, mentioning estimates of £1 billion to £2 billion for... download the app to read more
Follow top global news sources, read AI-powered summaries, ask AI your questions, translate news into your language, and join live chats — all with YoyoFeed!
